The new edition will (per the author) echo the conversational tone of the original, so it’s a great read for new investors, too. Consider buying a copy for yourself or your children2!
Wealthsimple is a broker who holds some of my retirement assets1. They had a “For Nerds Only” (recording here) event on October 22 where they announced a bunch of new features. The most exciting development for me was the pending availability of Norbert’s Gambit. Here’s my take.
Of no personal interest to me as I don’t trade them. There are an increasing number of ETF products that use “Covered Call” strategies in an effort to eke some (or more) yield out of held equities, but I don’t bother with products like that2. I like my investments simple.
I lump these two together since I have the same amount of interest in both of these developments: none. Although people have made huge profits on gold and crypto, I’d rather make money off of companies that make things or provide services.
An interesting product that allows you to buy into the entire index3 (TSX all-cap4 or S&P 5005) and hold individual stocks. The main benefit of this is automated tax-loss harvesting which should reduce your tax bill in a non-registered account. The idea is logical, but it will come down to how well it is executed — how closely will Direct Indexing actually track the underlying index, and how much tax savings can be realized? The benefit will have to be more than the 0.5% MER being charged for investing in the index this way. Of possible interest in a non-registered account, but not otherwise. I’m not actively adding to my non-registered investments, so I don’t think this is for me either, although I’ve often wondered about how many stocks you actually have to hold in order to get “close enough” to the performance of the TSX 60 / S&P 500.
Sounds like an offer ripped from the pages of CIBC, BMO, or RBC. Dedicated advisors, tailored advice. Wealthsimple’s differentiator appears to be in the fee structure. From https://www.wealthsimple.com/en-ca/advice:
Our fees start at 0.75% and drop to 0.4% for clients who have $10M or more with us.
I am not a fan of percentage-of-net-worth-based wealth management. It implies that larger portfolios are more complex. Anyway, this might be the kind of offer future, less-capable-me might be interested in, but at the moment, no thanks.
“Coming Soon”
The other features announced on the event are not available yet. But here’s a view all the same:
Summit Portfolio: sounds like a robo-advisor that also includes private equity. Since I like my investments to be liquid, this is another development that doesn’t really interest me.
Retirement Accelerator: cheap loans to help you with RRSP contributions. Leveraged investing doesn’t fit my risk profile, and, oh, by the way, I’m already retired 🙂
Norbert’s Gambit: This is something I use all the time given that i have a large amount of USD holdings in my retirement portfolio. The best thing about the Wealthsimple webinar is that they actually trotted out Norbert6 himself to talk about it! This is one feature missing from the Wealthsimple portfolio that was a “must have” for me given my current holdings.
AI Trading Features, Advanced Options Strategies: Yawn.
Wealthsimple continues to be a broker I like to watch as they keep the new features rolling out. They are still not a serious contender to be my #1 broker until they support self-directed spousal RRIFs, something they inexplicably still lack.
Mostly because of the DPSP debacle and the fact I needed a new Macbook. ↩︎
On the webcast, it sounded more like they held “a representative sample” of these indices, which makes sense to me; you couldn’t hold ALL the members of the index AND do tax-loss harvesting at the same time. Their FAQ at https://www.wealthsimple.com/en-ca/portfolios/direct-indexing confirms this. ↩︎
VCN is an ETF that holds the same index, as far as I can tell. ↩︎
VFV is an ETF that holds the same index priced in CAD. IVV is the same index priced in USD. I presume the Wealthsimple product is traded in USD, but they don’t explicitly say. ↩︎
I haven’t myself attended this summit before, but it appears to have a very strong lineup and interesting topics. And, good for the cheapskates among us, free if you watch the prerecorded content up to 48h after it’s posted.
It kicks off tomorrow with my hero, David Chilton, aka The Wealthy Barber. Also featured, another great speaker (who I thought was retired), Rob Carrick.
Register over at https://canadianfinancialsummit.com. Hurry! If you don’t watch the videos over the next few days, the only way to get access to the content is to buy an all-access pass.
If you have no idea what Norbert’s Gambit is, it’s a way to cheaply convert USD/CAD in your online brokerage account. Most brokers support it1.
Because I hold a lot of USD assets in my retirement savings, and since I live and spend most of my money in Canada, I need a way cheaply convert to Canadian funds in my RRIF. So last week, I had to convert some of my AOA holdings into XGRO holdings and so I updated the log I’m keeping. So far, I’ve done the Gambit three times this year, and twice I’ve lucked out on the FX rate changes and actually made money2 on the transaction.
And many people expect Wealthsimple to join this club soon. ↩︎
What I mean: if the funds had converted instantaneously with no fees rather than waiting around for the 3-5 business days for the Gambit to complete, I would have received LESS money than by using the Gambit. Over time, I expect this will even out, but right now I’m about $55 CAD ahead. ↩︎
(New to asset allocation ETFs aka all-in-ones? Here’s a good place to start.)
Asset allocation ETFs can be purchased from any number of companies. In this article, we look at 4 of the biggest names:
TD, with TEQT, TGRO, TBAL et al
Blackrock/iShares with XEQT, XGRO, XBAL et al
BMO with ZEQT, ZGRO, ZBAL et al
Vanguard with VEQT, VGRO, VBAL et al
The blueprint for each of these ETFs are similar: pick Canadian, US, International and (where applicable1) bond indices, pick a target percentage allocation for each slice of the pie, and carry on…
I previously talked about the variations in percentage allocation (the size of the pie slices) between the major funds over here.
But what about the indices that each of the major fund families track? What’s in the pie? Are there significant differences? Here’s a summary of what I found:
Bloomberg Global Aggregate Canadian Float Adjusted Bond
So there is variation in the pie recipes (the underlying indices), but is it really of any significance? At a glance, I wonder how different the offerings from iShares and BMO actually are — the same index providers show up in each. Without looking at what stocks are actually found in each of these, here’s a quick take, simply based on the names of the indices:
Canadian Equity: All of these funds hold the broad Canadian market, over three different index providers23. iShares and BMO use a capped index, which, in theory, should limit exposure to the very largest Canadian businesses somewhat.
US Equity: Three different index providers seen here (Solactive, S&P and CRSP). TD only holds large US companies, the others hold smaller and midsized US companies. In the last ten years, this has been a winning strategy, but it’s not always been that way.
International Equity: Three different index providers: Solactive, MSCI, FTSE. TD excludes emerging markets (e.g. Brazil, Russia, Taiwan, China, India). The others don’t.
Bonds: Hard to tell just based on the names, but three of them use the same FTSE index. Vanguard uses a Bloomberg index. So I’ll say that it’s likely that Vanguard’s bond portfolio will look different from the other three.
In a future post, I’ll delve into what the main holdings of each of these funds are in each of these categories to see what differences emerge. And whether these differences actually matter!
This excludes 100% equity funds like XEQT, naturally ↩︎
The “composite” in “Capped Composite” means “all the stocks of the TSX”. ↩︎
The Money Engineer 