Category: ETFs

News: Upcoming changes to S&P 500, S&P/TSX Composite

RobH1 Comment

As a dedicated low-fee ETF investor (new to ETFs? read more here), most of my holdings are actually tied up in various index funds; as of right now about 26% of my retirement savings are tied up in the S&P 5001 (largely by holding AOA and XGRO, two of my ETF all-stars), and another 11% are tied up in the S&P/TSX capped composite2 (a lot of which is due to holding XGRO)3.

Beyond making sure I keep my asset allocations in line (read more about that concept here), there’s not much to do. But this doesn’t mean that what I ultimately hold isn’t always changing!

I was reminded of that fact when I noted the latest announcements from S&P, who on a quarterly basis, rejig their indices to add new stocks and drop others. It’s not something I’ve typically paid any attention to, but I share it with you because I found it interesting.

S&P 500: AppLovin, Robinhood & Emcor added, MarketAxxess, Caesars and Enphase deleted

Effective, September 22, 2025 per the press release.

Newly added: AppLovin seems to deal in the world of online advertising, Robinhood is a notorious4 online broker, and Emcor looks to be a construction company.

Newly booted: Marketaxess sells a platform to financial services companies, Caesars operates casinos, and Enphase is a solar energy product company5.

S&P/TSX Composite6: 5 added, 2 deleted

Effective September 22, 2025 per the press release.

Newly added: Aris, Discovery, Perpetua and Skeena who are all involved with precious metals production7 and Curaleaf which is a weed dispenser.

Newly deleted: Enghouse (software and services, based in Markham) and Pason (products and services for oil and gas based in Calgary).

If ever you want to see what’s in either of these indicies, then check out this chart for the S&P 500 and this chart for the TSX composite.

  1. You can read about this index right from the source if you like. ↩︎
  2. There’s another 6% in the S&P/TSX60 index, which are the 60 largest Canadian firms. The 10 year return of these two indicies is nearly identical — 7.98% for the capped, 8.06% for the TSX 60. You can read about the capped composite here. ↩︎
  3. You may wonder where the rest of holdings are. There’s 15% in various bond indices, 5% in cash, and the rest are in an assortment of international indices (largest are MSCI World ex-US at 10% and MSCI EAFE IMI at around 5%) and lesser-known US/Canadian indicies (like FTSE all-cap Canada or S&P total market US). In the Canada/US case, I’m rather certain that an all-cap index has a very high correlation with the large-cap indices; I could have bundled it all together I suppose. ↩︎
  4. Notorious because they are associated with meme stocks. ↩︎
  5. It’s probably not a good time for any US company in the renewables business, sadly. ↩︎
  6. I wondered when the last change to the TSX 60 was. I couldn’t find one after September 2019! ↩︎
  7. Perhaps a “why I don’t need to buy gold bars from Costco” comment is apropos here ↩︎

How to share an RESP among multiple kids

RobHLeave a comment

In a previous post, I shared my approach for investing in an RESP, and I promised I’d show you how I share the funds therein between my kids.

To me, it didn’t seem fair to split the cash value of the RESP between the kids. My kids (I have two) started higher education at different times, years apart, and so needed the money at different times. The investments in the RESP continue to grow even after decumulation begins, so how to account for that?

The way I track it is in this Google Sheet.

The idea behind it is pretty simple. You create a “mutual fund” on the day the first withdrawal happens with a fixed number of units. (I used 1 unit = $1, but you could set your unit value to whatever you like). Then, each child (if you want to be fair) gets the SAME number of units on that day. Children sell their units as they request money from the RESP. The unit price fluctuates depending on the value of the RESP overall.

So say you have a $10000 RESP divided among 4 kids. On launch day, you create the fund and create 10000 units, each priced at $1. You give each of your 4 kids 2500 units on that day. On that day, that means they also each have $2500.

Kid #1 needs $5000 for tuition, and this means they spend 5000 units. That’s row 17 in the example sheet.

Time passes, and Kid 1 needs more money. The wisely-invested RESP continues to grow, and has nearly made back all the money that was removed from it, valued on December 1 at $99,800, which is entered in column B. The unit price has increased as a result, from $1 to $1.05 (that’s an automatic calculation).

So Kid 1 has 20,000 units, each worth $1.05. The other kids still have all 25000 units, but they are now worth more money, $1.05*25000 =$26,250.00. Kid 1’s $3000 request costs 2885 units thanks to the growth, and Kid 1’s unit balance is updated accordingly.

This continues on, and all you need to do is fill down more rows as you need them, entering the values in the yellow cells yourself. You can even withdraw for multiple kids on the same date.

I’ve been running our family RESP fund since August 2018; unit price was $1. I just completed a transaction for kid #2, and the unit value was $1.46. The last two years have been exceptionally kind to this fund.

If you have questions or comments on this method, hit me up at comments@moneyengineer.ca!

HISA and HISA-like ETF Table for September 2025

RobH3 Comments

HISAs, for those in the know1, are “High Interest Savings Accounts” and offer a nearly zero risk, highly liquid2, way to earn some interest on your cash holdings. If your broker doesn’t give you access to HISAs (or you have to pay large transaction fees to acquire them3), then there’s also ETFs that fit the bill, and some of them are now in this table, too.

ProviderFundLinkRate SheetRate
RBCRBF2011, RBF2021, RBF2031, RBF2041RBCLink2.30%
ScotiabankDYN6004, DYN5004, DYN3065, DYN3055, DYN3075ScotiabankLink2.45%
Equitable BankEQB1001, ETR1001Equitable Bankn/a2.30%
TDTDB8151, TDB8156, TDB8158, TDB8160TDn/a2.30%
RenaissanceATL5071Renaissancen/a2.30%
Home TrustHOM101,
HOM201		Home TrustLink2.40%
B2BBTB101B2B Bankn/a2.40%
ManulifeMIP610, MIP810Manulifen/a2.15%
National BankNBC200, NBC6200, NBC8200NBI Altamira CashPerformern/a2.30%
Global XCASHCASH Fact Sheetn/a2.55%4
EvolveHISAHISA Fact Sheetn/a2.45%5
BMOZMMKZMMK Fact Sheetn/a2.76%6
Canadian HISA and HISA-like ETF rates, last updated September 24, 2025

As both Canada and the US lowered their policy rates last week, the interest rates you see here are lower than what you could get last month7. US rates remain quite a bit higher than Canadian rates, which I took advantage of recently.

CASH and HISA are ETFs that hold HISAs; I’d expect their rates to drift lower next month. ZMMK is a very short-term bond fund that carries more risk than a HISA, but gives a slightly better return as a result. ZMMK appears in my ETF All-Stars list.

Since I hold a substantial amount of USD-denominated ETFs, I also track US interest rates.

ProviderFundLinkRate SheetRate
RBCRBF2015RBCLink3.90%
ScotiabankDYN6005,
DYN5005		ScotiabankLink3.90%
Equitable BankEQB1101,
ETR1101		Equitable Bankn/a3.80%
TDTDB8153TDn/a3.90%
RenaissanceATL5075Renaissancen/a3.90%
ManulifeMIP611Manulifen/a3.05%
National BankNBC201NBI Altamira CashPerformern/a3.90%
Global XUCSHUCSH Fact Sheetn/a4.18%8
EvolveHISUHISU Fact Sheetn/a3.99%9
iSharesICSHICSH Fact Sheetn/a4.53%10
USA HISA and HISA-like ETF rates, last updated September 24, 2025

UCSH and HISU invest in HISAs exclusively; I instead use ICSH which is a rough equivalent of ZMMK in terms of portfolio makeup. Like ZMMK, I enjoy a slight premium in yield as a reward for taking a bit more risk.

  1. You can read an intro over at Earn money with your cash: The HISA table February 2025 ↩︎
  2. I don’t like GICs for this reason. And they tend to not be very portable between brokers, either. ↩︎
  3. For example, Questrade, my current go-to broker. ↩︎
  4. As of August 29 distribution. ↩︎
  5. As of August 27 distribution ↩︎
  6. As of August 28 distribution ↩︎
  7. Except for the ETFs I track…they are a bit more volatile month to month, which makes sense given what they hold. ↩︎
  8. As of August 29 distribution ↩︎
  9. As of August 27 distribution ↩︎
  10. As of September 2 distribution ↩︎

What’s in my RESP portfolio?

RobH1 Comment

As summer shifts into fall, I’m reminded that it’s back-to-school time. Or “Dad, I need money for tuition” time. I still have kids attending higher education, still making withdrawals from the family RESP we set up shortly after the birth of son #1, almost 25 years (!) ago now. RESP investing is a bit different from retirement investing given the (hopefully) shorter timelines of RESP investing1. Here’s how I approach it.

In the early days of the RESP, the contributions were invested in mutual funds; these were dark days, long before the rise of very cheap ETFs. Mutual funds were the ONLY way to make routine contributions (which I made, monthly, without fail — Pay Yourself First and all that). I had an 80/20 mix of equities and bonds in the first 18 years or so of its existence: 4 funds, one for US Equity, one for Canadian equity, one for international equity and one for bonds. I don’t remember the specifics of which ones and what percentages exactly. But the fund kept growing, thanks to market returns as well as CESG grant money, which I took full advantage of2!

As son #1 came close to entering post-secondary studies, I shifted the portfolio to a 60/40 mix using individual ETFs like HXS for US Equities, HXT for Canadian Equities, HXDM for International Equities, and CBO for Bonds. The GlobalX funds didn’t throw off dividends3 and so I just had to deal with the periodic (monthly) distributions of CBO, which ultimately were set to DRIP4.

I made the decision to move to 60/40 over 80/20 to preserve a bit more of the capital in the event of some kind of market meltdown5. Growth gets curtailed somewhat as a result, but there’s less volatility.

But I finally realized that all of this was completely unnecessary thanks to all-in-one ETFs. So now, the RESP has exactly ONE holding — XBAL, an all-in-one from iShares that takes care of the 60/40 split for me. And this is set to DRIP as well, so every quarter the RESP picks up a few more XBAL shares.

You can see how XBAL has preformed over the past 15 years or so. I’m comparing it to the 80/20 XGRO ETF from the same family, one that features prominently in my ETF All-Stars page6:

In a future post, I’ll explain how I fairly divide the RESP among my two sons — in essence, I pretended that the RESP was a mutual fund, with each son receiving the same number of units on the day the first withdrawal was made. Withdrawals are henceforth made in units, not dollars, and the unit price fluctuates with the value of the RESP.

How are you managing your RESP? Let me know at comments@moneyengineer.ca.

  1. Less time to build wealth, shorter runway for decumulation ↩︎
  2. As a certified cheapskate, it’s hard for me to resist free money of any kind. ↩︎
  3. They are “corporate class” ETFs that use a clever structure to avoid paying out dividends; all growth is buried in the increase of the ETF’s price. I still hold some of these in my non-registered accounts. ↩︎
  4. Dividend Reinvestment Plan. Instead of getting cash in the RESP account, the DRIP buys additional shares of whatever generated the dividend in the first place. ↩︎
  5. One may ask why I chose to stick with 80/20 in retirement, which is against some conventional wisdom. I figured that the RESP decumulation phase would be over a much shorter time period (say 5-10 years) and so I would be less able to wait for a market bounce-back. In retirement, I’m hopeful that decumulation will take much, much longer, and so with 80/20 I have a better chance of outliving my savings. ↩︎
  6. Chart is courtesy http://www.dividendchannel.com, featured on Tools I Use. When I rolled the comparison all the way back to 2007 the 60/40 XBAL actually OUTPERFORMED the (supposedly) more risky XGRO. Can’t explain that one. ↩︎

Comparing asset-allocation ETFs: what’s the right allocation?

RobH1 Comment

I’ve talked about my approach to investing before, which is slavishly devoted to maintaining a constant asset allocation across all my accounts. And as I’ve mentioned, my current targets are:

  • 20% is Canadian Equity, 36% is US Equity, and 24% is International Equity, for a total of 80% equity overall
  • 15% bonds
  • 5% cash

My allocation targets were picked to align with XGRO1, which, over time, will make up more and more of my retirement portfolio2.

As I’ve written elsewhere, these are pretty broad categories and could be sub-divided further. I’ve not bothered with this myself, but I thought it would be an interesting exercise to survey what the major all-equity and high-growth funds have under the hood. And so, I present this comparison:

A few notes on the above:

  • Canadian Equity: Some use an all-cap index (TGRO, VGRO) while some use a capped composite index (ZGRO, XGRO).
  • US Equity: VGRO and XGRO use an all-cap index, TGRO sticks to large cap, and ZGRO holds large, mid and small cap indices. TGRO is a bit of an outlier because it doesn’t hold small cap..
  • International Equity: TGRO takes an all countries approach, whereas the other three split between developed and emerging markets. Net effect is pretty much the same thing.
  • Bonds: Here you find the greatest variation; VGRO is the only ETF to hold bonds outside of North America whereas TGRO holds only Canadian bonds. XGRO and ZGRO are pretty similar, with XGRO having a bit more Canadian bond exposure over ZGRO.

The most notable difference between my allocations and the average allocation of the big 4 funds is that I have more international exposure than other funds, and that’s because I’ve chosen to hitch my wagon to the iShares/XGRO family.

The reason? I started investing in the iShares family some time ago because it was the family that my old provider (QTrade) allowed me to trade without fees. With my current provider (Questrade), all of the families are free to trade, and hence my continued devotion to iShares/XGRO no longer holds that attraction — I could buy any of the all-in-ones. (Indeed, I’ve actually been adding some TD all-in-ones because their management fees are a bit lower).

But this exercise has given me food for thought; perhaps I have a bit too much bias to the international equity portion of the portfolio. But honestly, I can’t believe it makes that much of a difference, and churning my portfolio simply to reduce my international exposure a point or two seems unnecessary3.

  1. Why XGRO and not an all-in-one from another company? Read on. ↩︎
  2. I’m slowly converting my main holding (AOA, which trades in USD) to XGRO on a quarterly basis so that I’m never over exposed to foreign exchange variations. I convert a percentage of these holdings annually, corresponding to the percentage at which I’m draining my RRIF. ↩︎
  3. Running some numbers through https://www.dividendchannel.com/drip-returns-calculator/ demonstrates that XGRO is the bottom of the performance pile over the past 5 years or so as compared to TGRO, ZGRO and VGRO. The difference isn’t massive, and the window is short because these funds haven’t been around all that long, but it’s another data point to consider…p.s. the tool above doesn’t (yet?) understand the 3 for 1 reverse split ZGRO undertook in August, so best to end any simulation involving the BMO funds at August 1,2025. ↩︎