Tag: asset-allocation

dollar cut in half

Kicking USD out of my retirement portfolio

RobH1 Comment

After much consideration, I’ve decided that holding USD-denominated assets during retirement is no longer a good idea. I have been struggling with this question for a while now.

There are a few reasons why I’ve reached this conclusion:

  • I no longer spend USD. I have two credit cards1 that allow me to avoid foreign exchange fees.
  • Complexity. The USD in my RRIF accounts needs to be converted periodically since withdrawals are in CAD. The USD in my non-registered account might eventually lead me to have to file a T1135, and I hate new tax wrinkles. And of course the USD funds add to the universe of funds I have to manage in all the accounts. Fewer is better!
  • Choice. Without USD in my portfolio, the universe of DIY brokers opens up2 and the number of accounts I have to have is also reduced34.

The fluctuating CAD/USD FX rate might be another reason, but that hasn’t really bothered me. In the long term, it’s reasonably stable.

So how to go about doing it, and what impacts will this have? Let’s take a look.

General considerations

So of course, the only real way to convert USD into CAD at Questrade is to use Norbert’s Gambit. Performing the Gambit is a multi-day activity:

  • Day 1: Sell the USD asset and buy DLR.U with the proceeds; make journaling request to convert DLR.U into DLR
  • Day 2: Wait for settlement of trades made on day 1
  • Day 3: Wait for journaling to complete
  • Day 4: Wait for journaling to complete
  • Day 5: Sell DLR and buy CAD-listed assets to replace what I sold on day 1

Each time I do this exercise, it makes me a little leery since

  • I have to pay $9.95 plus GST to journal the shares on Questrade (not a huge deal, but as you have read elsewhere on the blog, I am a cheapskate)
  • I’m out of the market for 3 days. I really hate being out of the market since big moves can happen over short periods of time. Of course, this cuts both ways; I could miss a big rally or a big meltdown as a result5.
  • I’m making a bet on favourable FX rates. FX rates don’t typically swing much in short periods of time, but since over 50% of my retirement portfolio is in USD I’m not willing to try to find the “right” time to make such a trade.

As a result, I’ve made the decision to

  • Sell off 1/6th of my USD portfolio every month for the next six months (or thereabouts). This will allow me to smooth out any FX speed bumps and limits how much of my portfolio is idle at any one time.
  • Take advantage of a free month of Questrade Plus6 and do a few journaling requests during this month and save a few bucks

While doing all of this, I’m trying to be mindful of my asset allocation targets which are (newly set as a result of my analysis at Are my portfolio’s asset allocation targets “correct”?)

  • 5% Cash
  • 15% Bonds
  • 23% Canadian Equity
  • 37% US Equity
  • 20% International Equity

I’ll try to start moving my portfolio to these new targets as I make this shift, but given the targets are brand new, I’m in no particular time constraints; I’m expecting the portfolio to slowly move from the old targets to the new ones, finally landing at some point later in 2026.

Kicking USD out of my RRIF accounts

Of the 5 RRIF accounts I have in the household (three for me, two for my spouse), only two of them have USD in it, and the USD portion is 100% invested in either AOA (an 80/20 all-in-one global equity fund) or ICSH (an ultra short-term bond fund that stands in for cash)

AOA can be replaced with XGRO but it’s not an exact replacement. AOA has almost no Canadian Equity content and a higher US Equity content than XGRO. This means that a one-to-one switch will cause my Canadian Equity content to increase and my US content to decrease. I’m expecting this will eventually cause me to need to replace some of my AOA with a pure play US Equity asset. I’ve chosen VFV since it mirrors the S&P 500, an index that won’t be adding the mega-IPOs any time soon 🙂

ICSH can be replaced with ZMMK since they are similar in nature, but I’m not going to do that. Why? Because I hold ZMMK in my non-registered account as a VPW cash cushion, I do make trades in ZMMK from time to time. I don’t want to end up in a situation where I’m selling ZMMK in my non registered account and buying it in my RRIF, since this could deprive me of possible (small) capital losses — CRA does not look kindly on trying to “artificially” generate capital losses in this way.

So after mulling it over a bit, I’ve decided to replace ICSH in my RRIF accounts with ZST. It’s a short term bond fund which is a bit riskier than ZMMK7, but I’m counting on it being cash-like for my purposes. Neither has been around all that long, but it appears they are pretty close on the performance front with a slight edge for ZST.

So when all is said and done, my RRIFs should have three holdings: XGRO (mostly), VFV (some), ZST (about 2.5% of overall portfolio),

Kicking USD out of my non-registered accounts

Here there are two holdings

  • ICSH in my VPW cash cushion account
  • SCHF, an international equity fund I’ve held for years and years

The ICSH replacement is easy — move it to ZMMK. I’ll do that all at once. It will mean a loss of over a percentage point in gains at the moment, but this is the price of simplicity, I guess.

The SCHF sale is a bit like selling 6 months of RRIF payments all at once, which will attract a capital gain. I’m ok with that, but I’d prefer to avoid more capital gains for the rest of the year (I didn’t budget for that when I tried to work out my likely tax bill for 2026). Since selling SCHF is actually helpful in getting my new asset allocation targets right, I don’t need to replace it with another International Equity fund. My calculations tell me that I’ll probably need to replace it with a Canadian Equity fund. Here I’ve chosen to use VCN since it uses a different index provider8 and would be considered different from my other non-registered Canadian equity funds, namely XIC and HXT9. Buying VCN and selling it in subsequent months to fund my retirement salary should result in minimal capital gains for the remainder of the year.

So when all is said and done, the VPW cash cushion account should be 100% ZMMK and the other non registered account will be 100% CAD-listed ETFs, mostly tied up in Canadian Equity.

You’ll be able to see my progress in my next instalment of What’s in my retirement portfolio (May 2026) which I should have ready at the end of this month!

  1. Rogers Mastercard and Wealthsimple Visa, as detailed in What are the best credit cards? ↩︎
  2. e.g. Wealthsimple does not currently (June 2026) support USD RRIF accounts. ↩︎
  3. e.g. QTrade USD accounts are always separated from CAD accounts. So instead of 4 RRIF accounts, I could have 8 at QTrade. Painful. ↩︎
  4. I guess that’s actually a “reduce complexity” argument. Don’t tell anybody. ↩︎
  5. https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=370885 shows me that my fears are unfounded. It’s practically a normal distribution. ↩︎
  6. A subscription service offered by Questrade to give you free journaling. And other things I don’t really care about. ↩︎
  7. Average duration is longer, which makes its price more sensitive to changes in the overall interest rate environment. ↩︎
  8. FTSE Canada all cap rather than S&P/TSX for the others ↩︎
  9. And therefore avoids CRA’s superficial loss rules ↩︎

Comparing asset-allocation ETFs: what’s the right allocation?

RobH1 Comment

I’ve talked about my approach to investing before, which is slavishly devoted to maintaining a constant asset allocation across all my accounts. And as I’ve mentioned, my current targets are:

  • 20% is Canadian Equity, 36% is US Equity, and 24% is International Equity, for a total of 80% equity overall
  • 15% bonds
  • 5% cash

My allocation targets were picked to align with XGRO1, which, over time, will make up more and more of my retirement portfolio2.

As I’ve written elsewhere, these are pretty broad categories and could be sub-divided further. I’ve not bothered with this myself, but I thought it would be an interesting exercise to survey what the major all-equity and high-growth funds have under the hood. And so, I present this comparison:

A few notes on the above:

  • Canadian Equity: Some use an all-cap index (TGRO, VGRO) while some use a capped composite index (ZGRO, XGRO).
  • US Equity: VGRO and XGRO use an all-cap index, TGRO sticks to large cap, and ZGRO holds large, mid and small cap indices. TGRO is a bit of an outlier because it doesn’t hold small cap..
  • International Equity: TGRO takes an all countries approach, whereas the other three split between developed and emerging markets. Net effect is pretty much the same thing.
  • Bonds: Here you find the greatest variation; VGRO is the only ETF to hold bonds outside of North America whereas TGRO holds only Canadian bonds. XGRO and ZGRO are pretty similar, with XGRO having a bit more Canadian bond exposure over ZGRO.

The most notable difference between my allocations and the average allocation of the big 4 funds is that I have more international exposure than other funds, and that’s because I’ve chosen to hitch my wagon to the iShares/XGRO family.

The reason? I started investing in the iShares family some time ago because it was the family that my old provider (QTrade) allowed me to trade without fees. With my current provider (Questrade), all of the families are free to trade, and hence my continued devotion to iShares/XGRO no longer holds that attraction — I could buy any of the all-in-ones. (Indeed, I’ve actually been adding some TD all-in-ones because their management fees are a bit lower).

But this exercise has given me food for thought; perhaps I have a bit too much bias to the international equity portion of the portfolio. But honestly, I can’t believe it makes that much of a difference, and churning my portfolio simply to reduce my international exposure a point or two seems unnecessary3.

  1. Why XGRO and not an all-in-one from another company? Read on. ↩︎
  2. I’m slowly converting my main holding (AOA, which trades in USD) to XGRO on a quarterly basis so that I’m never over exposed to foreign exchange variations. I convert a percentage of these holdings annually, corresponding to the percentage at which I’m draining my RRIF. ↩︎
  3. Running some numbers through https://www.dividendchannel.com/drip-returns-calculator/ demonstrates that XGRO is the bottom of the performance pile over the past 5 years or so as compared to TGRO, ZGRO and VGRO. The difference isn’t massive, and the window is short because these funds haven’t been around all that long, but it’s another data point to consider…p.s. the tool above doesn’t (yet?) understand the 3 for 1 reverse split ZGRO undertook in August, so best to end any simulation involving the BMO funds at August 1,2025. ↩︎

What’s the deal with XEQT?

RobH3 Comments

***updated this post to reflect the fact that XEQT has dropped XUS from its portfolio as of July 2, 2025***

This post is inspired by my original on the topic, “What’s the deal with XGRO“? XGRO is great, but since my target asset allocation is only 15% bonds, and XGRO’s bond target is 20%, there’s some tweaking I have to do in order to reduce the bond exposure. That tweak is increasingly being provided by XEQT, part of the same iShares family that produced XGRO.

(As mentioned elsewhere, I rely heavily on all-in-one ETFs in my retirement portolio. New to all-in-ones? Read a bit about them here.)

XEQT, like XGRO, is actually investing in thousands1 of different stocks. Unlike XGRO, it does not hold any bonds at all. I thought it would be interesting to see what, exactly, is underneath every $100 you invest in XEQT. See the results below:

FundWhat is it?How much?Compare with XGRO23
ITOT/ XTOT4Broad US stock coverage that tracks the S&P Total Market Index, about 2529 companies (top holdings: Apple, Nvidia, Microsoft, Amazon, Meta)$43.62 of your $100 investment$36.32 of your $100 investment
XEFBroad international (Europe, Asia, Australia) stock coverage that tracks the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index, about 2500 holdings$25.25 of your $100 investment
$19.76 of your $100 investment
XICBroad Canadian stock coverage that tracks the S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index, about 223 companies (top holdings: RBC, Shopify, TD, Enbridge, Brookfield)$25.71 of your $100 investment
$20.09 of your $100 investment
XEC3000+ emerging market stocks that track the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index$5.04 of your $100 investment$4.07 of your $100 investment

The top 10 stocks of XEQT as of today looks like this:

TickerCompanyInvestment for every $100
NVDANvidia$2.99
MSFTMicrosoft$2.70
AAPLApple$2.26
RYRoyal Bank$1.67
AMZNAmazon$1.54
SHOPShopify$1.35
TDTD Bank$1.15
METAMeta$1.09
AVGOBroadcom$0.96
ENBEnbridge$0.88
Total$16.59
Top 10 holdings of XEQT as of July 25, 20255

The top stock holding outside North America belongs to Taiwan Semiconductor, at 46 cents for every $100 invested. Additionally, the geographic exposure looks like this:

Geographic exposure of XEQT as of July 25, 2025

One other little tidbit that might be interesting: the distribution yield of XEQT is 2.94% compared with 2.91% for XGRO. This I find a bit surprising, since I would have expected XGRO’s yield to be quite a bit better.

  1. 8,550 to be precise, as of today ↩︎
  2. As of today, might be different from when I wrote https://moneyengineer.ca/2025/01/30/whats-the-deal-with-xgro/ ↩︎
  3. And, if you’re really paying attention, you’ll see that the dollar amounts of this column add up to roughly $80, in keeping with the 80/20 philosophy of XGRO. ↩︎
  4. i lump these together because they hold exactly the same thing. Some loophole that iShares needs to exploit, I gather. ↩︎
  5. On the date I pulled these numbers, cash cracked the top 10 for a holding of $1.34, which is not usual, so I just dropped it. Not sure why that is…perhaps by the end of the month it will resolve itself. ↩︎

Rebalancing the portfolio: A real-life example

RobH1 Comment

If you adhere to asset-allocation strategies (as I do) then rebalancing your assets to reset them back to your targets is a way to make sure you stay on track1. Some people do this on a regular basis (monthly, quarterly, annually) but I try to do it whenever the drift becomes noticeable (more than 1% off of my targets2). The targets for my portfolio are

  • 5% cash
  • 15% bonds
  • 20% Canadian equity
  • 36% US Equity
  • 24% International equity

Given the week we’ve just had, it’s not really a surprise to see that I’m overweight in cash, and underweight in foreign equity. Some of my cash is untouchable because it’s the built-in cushion that Variable Percentage Withdrawal (VPW) requires3, so that’s out. The majority of the cash in play is found in my RRIF accounts, and most of that is found in USD.

So the problem to solve for is to find a low-cost International Equity ETF that sells on the US market. Let’s walk through the steps I go through for that.

Copy what’s in my USD all-in-one ETF

Long time readers will know that most of my USD holdings are invested in AOA. (What’s the deal with AOA? Asked and answered here.) Since AOA is an all-in-one ETF, and since I know that AOA has international holdings (around 28%), and I know that AOA is inexpensive to hold, I can just do what AOA does, right?

So that is certainly a possibility, but as it turns out, AOA invests in TWO international ETFs, namely:

  • IDEV, which is a broad international ETF that tracks the developed world (you can see the Sector and Geographic breakdown here)
  • IEMG, which is a broad international ETF that tracks emerging markets (Sector and Geographic breakdown here)

IDEV and IEMG are both excellent funds, but I don’t really want to buy two funds if I can help it. AOA holds these two in a roughly 3:1 ratio, and I am too lazy to keep that straight.

So time for plan B.

Google for an appropriate ETF

So I type “international ETF USD” into Google and see what I get.

The first hit is linking to etfdb.com which isn’t my favourite website. They always list 100 ETFs when I want to choose from maybe 4. So I skip that link.

Then I get a hit for IXUS, which is an iShares product. This one I’ve heard of, and it has a clever name (ex-US, get it?). On IXUS’ overview page, I see three promising factoids:

  • It provides “exposure to a broad range of international developed and emerging market companies4“
  • It has a MER of 0.07%, which is acceptable.
  • It’s not clear to me how much is in emerging markets, but the geographic exposure breakdown includes some non-G7 economies, so that’s good.

So that’s pretty good, but I want to look at least one more ETF to be a good comparison shopper.

A little bit further down I get a hit for VXUS, a Vanguard product. Like IXUS, it has a clever name (ex-US, get it?) and so I feel compelled to look closer.

And I see three factoids again:

  • It provides “Broad exposure across developed and emerging non-U.S. equity markets”
  • Its MER is 0.05%
  • The geographic exposure breakdown looks an awful lot like IXUSes, even though the underlying index it’s tracking is different5

And so, with that, the decision is made: we go with VXUS because it’s 0.02% cheaper than IXUS.

Actually DOING the rebalancing

This will be new ground for me, because it will be using my new provider for the first time (Questrade). My old provider let me sell one ETF and immediately buy another, and I assume that Questrade will also allow this, but until I try it, I’ve learned not to assume things.

Oh, yes, the “cash” in my USD RRIF is actually also an ETF, namely ICSH, which is because Questrade doesn’t provide any other means to earn money on “cash”.

So anyway, on Monday, a few hours after the stock market opens, I’ll take a look and see if trading is still a advisable — has the market suddenly recovered? Is it so volatile it warrants sitting on the sidelines? I’m guessing both of those will be a solid “no”, but I will wait until Monday to follow through.

Rebalancing (Somewhat) Complete

I signed in yesterday to my brokerage account around lunchtime so I missed all the morning’s excitement. After everything I wrote above, I didn’t buy VXUS after all — since my US equity portion was also significantly below target, I bought AOA instead, thus increasing both my US and International equity positions at the same time. I used a limit order since the bid/ask spread was like 20 cents, far higher than I’m used to seeing.

When markets are this nutty, I don’t like making all purchases at once. Since Questrade trading of ETFs is now totally free, I can take my time and incrementally shift the portfolio back to targets.

  1. Long time readers may wonder why rebalancing in my portfolio (which is dominated by asset allocation ETFs) is required at all — one of the reasons to invest in an all-in-one is BECAUSE it rebalances automatically. The answer is simple — although MOST of my portfolio is in all-in-ones, not ALL of it is. As I prepared my portfolio for retirement (read more about that here), I couldn’t justify selling assets and attracting capital gains in my non-registered account just to make the portfolio simpler. ↩︎
  2. I track those targets using the Multi-Asset tracker found here ↩︎
  3. VPW is how I get paid in retirement. You can read about the method here. ↩︎
  4. Closer reading of the product page shows IXUS tracks the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index ↩︎
  5. VXUS tracks the FTSE Global All Cap ex US index ↩︎