ZGRO versus ZGRO.T: what’s the difference?

ZGRO and ZGRO.T are both asset allocation funds (aka all-in-ones1) offered by BMO. They hold the same assets, and they both generate the same (dividends-reinvested) returns. But ZGRO.T says it has a yield of 5.65% whereas ZGRO has a yield of 1.73%2. How is this possible? Full disclosure: I don’t own either of these funds because I have historically invested in a very similar-to-ZGRO product, XGRO, instead3.

Let’s start with a really high level look at these funds4.

ZGRO vs ZGRO.T, Overview Tab (source bmogam.com)

The first thing I’ll point out is one of caution: ZGRO and ZGRO.T have very similar tickers and it’s all-too-easy to mix them up. The fund names are also very similar, although ZGRO.T adds the words “Fixed Percentage Distribution Units” to the mix. That’s a clue. The other things we can learn from this first glance is that ZGRO.T is pretty new (Inception Date), is about 1/20th the size of ZGRO in terms of investments (Net Assets), has an identical MER to ZGRO, but whoa, that distribution yield is off the charts. Put simply, if you had $1000 in ZGRO, and $1000 in ZGRO.T, and the last distribution paid was assumed to be constant5, you’d get $11.73 from ZGRO and $56.50 from ZGRO.T over the next twelve months. Huh?

This is even more puzzling if one takes a look at what each of the two ETFs hold: it’s identical:

ETF HeldZGRO %6ZGRO.T %
ZSP – S&P 50037.037.0
ZCN – TSX Capped20.420.4
ZAG – CAD Bond13.813.8
ZEA – MSCI EAFE13.413.4
ZEM – MSCI Emerg6.76.7
ZUAG – US Bond5.85.8
ZMID – US Mid Cap2.02.0
ZSML – US Small Cap1.01.0
Cash00

Comparing top holdings, ZGRO versus ZGRO.T. Can you see a difference? I can’t see a difference.

I spent quite a bit of time searching on the BMO website trying to get their take on the difference. In a lot of places, (e.g. the simplified prospectus7), the two funds are treated as the same. After nearly giving up, I did come across this document which has a teeny tiny footnote, which I reproduce here:

These units are Fixed Percentage Distribution Units that provide a fixed monthly distribution based on an annual distribution rate. Distributions may be comprised of net income, net realized capital gains and/or a return of capital. The monthly amount is determined by applying the annual distribution rate to the T Series Fund’s unit price at the end of the previous calendar year, arriving at an annual amount per unit for the coming year. This annual amount is then divided into 12 equal distributions, which are paid each month.

BMO Asset Allocation ETFs Whitepaper

So the big difference as I see is is that ZGRO.T attempts to give a stable yield in 12 month chunks. It does this by

  1. Giving you dividends from the underlying assets (so does ZGRO)
  2. Selling underlying assets (and generating a capital gain)
  3. Giving you back your own money (this is known as as return of capital)

Let’s take a look at the two from a tax perspective (note that this only matters if you were to hold these funds in a non-registered account):

ZGRO vs ZGRO.T 2024 Distribution Tax Tab (source bmogam.com)

And here the distinction between the two becomes clearer: ZGRO.T is making good use of Return of Capital (RoC) to distribute a dividend with limited near-term tax implications. But as always, there’s no free lunch — using RoC means that future capital gains will be higher since RoC reduces the ACB8 of the funds in question, and if your ACB drops to zero, you have to treat RoC as a capital gain.

So when might you consider using ZGRO.T instead of ZGRO?

ZGRO.T makes sense in a RRIF account. It’s essentially automating some of the steps I have to take every month to get paid (you can see the mechanism I use here). Every month, I have to sell some of my holdings in order to get the RRIF-minimum payment out.

In a non-registered account, ZGRO.T’s monthly distributions might be useful if you had the need for consistent monthly cash flow; in addition, if you expect to at some point be in a lower tax bracket, it might help you save future tax, since it’s deferring some gains by using Return of Capital. In my case, I don’t see a good reason to use it since I would have to sell existing assets in order to raise funds to buy it, which generates capital gains.

So, in summary, the two funds are the same from a total return perspective, with ZGRO.T more monthly cash and ZGRO providing more paper gains. In a RRIF account, ZGRO.T automates some of the manual selling needed to execute decumulation. In a non-registered account, the tax treatment of the two is different, and you’d have to work out the numbers to see if it’s a benefit or not.

  1. If you want to read about all-in-ones, https://moneyengineer.ca/2025/01/21/why-you-can-fire-your-advisor-asset-allocation-etfs/ is a good place to start. ↩︎
  2. This yield is calculated by dividing the most recent per share distribution by the share price and multiplying by 12. In essence, this number is the value of the most recent (monthly in the case of ZGRO.T, quarterly in the case of ZGRO) dividend payout extrapolated over the full year. It may or may not represent what kind of yield you get in the future. ↩︎
  3. Why? Inertia. There are minor differences in the makeup of XGRO versus ZGRO but either is a fine choice for the lazy investor. ↩︎
  4. All the tables here are right off BMO’s ETF selector, which is excellent, by the way. ↩︎
  5. ZGRO is currently paying 7.3 cents per share every quarter and this has been stable since 2020. ZGRO.T is currently paying 6 cents per unit held every month and this has been stable since March 2025. ↩︎
  6. As of September 18, 2025 ↩︎
  7. which weighs in at ~450 pages. I’d hate to see the non-simplified prospectus. ↩︎
  8. Adjusted Cost Base. The average per unit price you pay for a share, necessary to track in order to accurately calculate capital gains (or losses). I use adjustedcostbase.ca for this, found in Tools I Use ↩︎

Taxes in Retirement

There’s really no avoiding paying taxes, even in retirement. You probably have to do some budgeting to make sure you aren’t being caught unaware, though.

My retirement today is funded from a combination of my spouse’s part-time salary, my/my spouse’s RRIF, selling off assets from my non-registered account, and interest/dividend income from non-registered accounts.

The big difference, as I’m slowly becoming aware, is that aside from my spouse’s paycheque (which has the usual tax deductions / CPP contributions / EI contributions), there is nothing being set aside to pay my tax bill come April 2026. So it goes without saying that I had better make sure there’s a nugget somewhere that I set aside for the upcoming tax bill.

How much should that be? Enter a tool I use to help figure out that sort of thing, referenced in the “Tools I Use” section of this blog: namely, the Basic Canadian Income Tax Calculator1.

The Basic Canadian Income Tax Calculator, from TaxTips.ca

The basic tool, as implied, is pretty basic. It doesn’t include any sorts of deductions aside from the basic personal deduction and dividend tax credits. There’s an advanced calculator that has a bunch more inputs, but for the purposes of this article, the basic tool is good enough.

For the purposes of this tool, your income is in 4 buckets:

  • Other income: This is how 100% of RRIF payments are treated, as well as interest from non-registered assets (e.g. interest from a GIC, bank account, HISA, some ETFs)
  • Capital gains: This is only applicable to non-registered accounts. Note that many ETFs actually generate capital gains and a corresponding T3/T5 slip even if you don’t touch the fund at all2. Larger capital gains are typically generated when you sell an ETF that you’ve held for a while, which includes everything I hold in my non-registered accounts.
  • Canadian eligible dividends: This includes dividends paid by all public companies in Canada.
  • Canadian non-eligible dividends: I don’t have any of those, but if you own shares in a private corporation, you might.

Since my 2025 strategy is to simply collect RRIF minimum payments, I already know what that dollar amount is. I also execute non-registered asset sales monthly to fund my retirement, as I mentioned here. This generates capital gains every month; the exact amount this will sum up to in 2025 is unknowable in advance since it depends on factors like:

  • what specific asset I choose to sell
  • the price of the asset at the time I choose to sell
  • how many shares of the asset I sell at that price

I do track a metric I call “capital gain dollars per dollar of asset sold3” so I can compare the capital gain impact of generating (say) $1000 cash for every asset I own in my non-registered account. So I have a bit of control over the capital gain metric for a given year, but not a lot. My spouse also has non-registered assets in her name, but since she’s earning a salary, I’ll let that be for now.

Some examples might help illustrate the different tax impacts of different withdrawal strategies.

Let’s consider 4 examples, all of which give you 100k gross salary, before taxes:

  • The “RRIF and interest only” strategy: All income for the year is generated by either RRIF payments or interest payments from non-registered accounts.
  • The “non-registered asset sale only” strategy: All income for the year is generated by selling assets in non-registered accounts that create 70 cents of capital gain for every dollar of income thus generated4.
  • The “Dividends only” strategy: All income for the year is in the form of dividends. You’d need a pretty large portfolio to generate 100k of dividend income, just sayin’.
  • The “Blended Approach” strategy: Income comes from a mix of RRIF payments, non-registered asset sales, and dividends. You could play with the percentages yourself; this is an excellent way to see how different liquidation strategies generate (in some cases) very different tax bills.

The table below uses the basic tax calculator to generate the tax bill of the different payment strategies.

Withdrawal strategyRRIF + Interest incomeIncome from asset salesActual Capital GainDividendsTotal Gross IncomeTotal Tax Bill (ON)Avg Tax Rate
RRIF and Interest only100k000100k21.4k21.4%
Non Registered asset sales only0100k70k0100k3.9k5.6%
Dividends only00100k100k3.3k3.3%
A blended approach50k25k17.5k25k100k10.6k11.5%

Fair warning: don’t try to use this table to estimate your own situation. I chose 100k to keep the math easy, but since Canadian tax brackets have different tax rates, the overall gross salary chosen makes a huge difference in the tax bill — enter the numbers yourself!

My retirement planner advised me to target an average tax rate of no more than 15%, and besides the “RRIF and interest only” approach, all of the withdrawal strategies in the table accomplish that. The other takeaway is that on an income of $100k, all of the approaches generate a tax bill in excess of $3k — which happens to be the magic number CRA uses to determine whether or not you have to pay tax in installments.

As a result of doing this exercise, I’ve started a monthly automated contribution to a separate “tax” account5 so that I have money at the ready to pay my tax bill next year. All DIY retirees may want to do the same!

  1. You will probably have to close a bunch of ads before ultimately getting to the page that matters. It’s a forgivable tax to for this useful site, IMHO. ↩︎
  2. If you prefer to avoid annual capital gains, dividends and interest payments, then Global X has ETFs that are designed to do just that. I hold HXT (for Canadian Equity) and HXS (for US Equity) in my non-registered accounts for this reason. ↩︎
  3. This is just the per share capital gain divided by the current share price. I use Adjusted Cost Base to keep track of my capital gains. ↩︎
  4. This is a bit higher than the average of my portfolio, which is about 60 cents for long-held assets. You could choose a different number based on your own holdings. You only pay tax on half of your capital gains, and the calculator knows this. ↩︎
  5. I used Wealthsimple for this since it’s stupidly easy to create a new investment account. And they pay a reasonable amount of interest. ↩︎