Tag: RoC

MyACB: A new ACB Tool

RobHLeave a comment

ACB stands for “Adjusted Cost Base”, and is something you need to care about if you have non-registered stocks/ETFs that you buy and sell. If you don’t track your ACB, you can’t calculate the capital gains and losses for a given asset sale.

“But that’s what the T5008 is for, isn’t it?”

Theoretically, yes, but online brokers are notoriously sloppy with tracking ACB and hence your T5008 may not track capital gains properly. Some common reasons why this is are:

  • You hold the same asset at multiple brokers (or even within multiple accounts at the same broker). The CRA doesn’t care where you own the asset, they only care that you own the asset. No matter how many ways and in how many accounts the asset is sliced, CRA considers there to be only one ACB for all of them.
  • You move the asset from one broker to another and the ACB gets set incorrectly by the receiving broker
  • Your asset is priced in USD and your broker is using a different FX rate from you1
  • Your asset delivers a return of captial (RoC for short) which lowers your ACB (and increases future capital gains); your broker may or may not track this on your behalf
  • Your asset reinvests dividends into the fund (this sounds the same as a DRIP, but it isn’t — it’s commonly known as a “phantom distribution”). This increases your ACB.
  • Your asset undergoes a share split or share merge.

For these reasons, I don’t trust T5008s, and I track my own ACB. In Tools I Use I mention the ACB tool I use; it’s the one I have been using for many years now, namely Adjusted Cost Base. (Before that I think I used an Excel template…which I converted to ClarisWorks format, but I digress…)

I use the free version of Adjusted Cost Base because it suits my needs, and I wasn’t aware of a reasonable alternative, and I’m a cheapskate. But it seems there is one now — MyACB. I gave MyACB a quick spin this week, here’s how it compares to Adjusted Cost Base, both in “Free” mode:

User InterfacePortfolios Automated FX Automated RoC and phantom distributions Import from other sourcesPay models
Adjusted Cost Base Not pretty; subscription eliminates ads– two; 5 with subscriptionNoNo, requires subscriptionNo, requires subscription$49/year
MyACB Pretty– one; 5 with family subscription,
100 with “pro” subscription 		YesFor one asset only; more assets require subscriptionYes$29/year for family

$99/year for pro2

User Interface

Adjusted Cost Base won’t win any graphic design awards3. The design is functional but not at all modern looking. MyACB looks like a modern website. Dark mode? Check. Logical layout? Check. And at present, MyACB is ad-free4.

One big thing MyACB does better than Adjusted Cost Base is its support for editing portfolios, specifically related to deleting symbols. It’s far too easy to accidently trash an in-use symbol in Adjusted Cost Base. MyACB makes it very clear how destructive your desired action will be and asks for a specific and impossible-to-click-too-fast confirmation!

Portfolios

Tracking ACB for me means tracking it in my account, my spouse’s account, and our joint account. So that’s three portfolios. And I try to hold different assets in different portfolios to avoid raising the CRA’s ire.

Anyway, my three portfolios exceed the “free” capacity of both products; I get around the restriction by having my spouse have her own Adjusted Cost Base account to track her portfolio. Not a big deal, just a minor inconvenience. With MyACB it would be a bit trickier.

Once nice thing that MyACB does here is support for a “Group” of portfolios. This allows for a user to have multiple portfolios at multiple brokers to keep an eye on superficial losses. I wasn’t able to test this function, since MyACB is limited to one portfolio in the free version. But I can see it as being useful. (In my case, as an Adjusted Cost Base user, I just merge all my transactions across multiple accounts into one portfolio and achieve the same result. The MyACB model is cleaner and more useful).

Automated FX

Since I trade in both USD and CAD, I need to know what the CAD<->USD exchange rate is on day of settlement5. If you only hold CAD-denominated assets, then this won’t matter to you.

Here the free version of MyACB wins hands down. MyACB will do FX calculations for you by looking up the FX rate on the day of settlement. This is a something Adjusted Cost Base makes you enter manually.

Automated RoC and phantom distributions

ETFs have a habit of using these means of distributing money to their unit holders. I’m no tax accountant, but you can read all about these weird distributions over on both of the websites

Both tools offer support for these, no issue there. I’ve been tracking these distributions in Adjusted Cost Base for years.

MyACB adds a small teaser in the free version that allows you to automatically add these transactions for any ONE asset in your portfolio6. So if your non-registered account has one asset, this might be construed as useful. For me, and my 10 different non-registered assets, it’s merely an effort to entice me to pony up and pay for the family version of MyACB. Anyway, I tried it out and it performs as advertised, and is an exceedingly useful feature, but in the free version, it’s really just a way to kick the tires for most of us.

But compared to the free version of Adjusted Cost Base, one thing missing is support for multiple portfolios. Adjusted Cost Base’s free version supports two portfolios. I actually need three portfolios: one for my account, one for my spouse’s account, and one for our joint account. To get around that restriction, my spouse tracks her portfolio in her own Adjusted Cost Base account.

.

Import from other sources

Adjusted cost base doesn’t offer this in their free version, but it’s in the subscription version.

MyACB allows this in the free version, not too surprising, since it’s the new kid in town. The feature seems well thought out, and includes contributions from others (“schemas”) to save you time in figuring out how to map fields to MyACB.

I did try to do an export from Adjusted Cost Base to MyACB and ran into a few problems:

  • The way splits are modelled in the two platforms is different. MyACB puts the split ratio in a dedicated field, whereas Adjusted Cost Base puts in two places — once in the Transaction field and once in the Shares field. A bit of Google Sheets post-processing can fix this, but this may be a problem for a user less familiar with string manipulations.
  • In MyACB, the ticker symbol is mandatory, whereas in Adjusted Cost Base it isn’t.
  • Adjusted Cost Base doesn’t call out the currency used, just the exchange rate, and a “yes/no” if it’s a foreign currency transaction. MyACB stores the currency “kind” (e.g. USD, EUR etc). Again, a minor difference, but one that requires some thought as to how to covert one to the other.

Am I switching?

For the moment, no. Adjusted Cost Base meets my needs, and it would require some work for me to move to MyACB. To get the most out of the switch, I would have to pony up for a family plan given the portfolio limitations in MyACB’s free version. If you’re just starting out in getting help with your ACB tracking, either tool will meet your needs. MyACB has some nice features in the free version (automatic FX lookups, transaction importing) that warrant giving it a close look.

What do you think? Let me know at comments@moneyengineer.ca!

  1. There’s more than one acceptable way to do this. What I do is find the Bank of Canada rate on the settlement date and use that. ↩︎
  2. “Tax pros” is an assumption on my part. I don’t see how even the most dedicated DIYer has a need for 100 portfolios… ↩︎
  3. I see that the top hat guy for Adjusted Cost Base’s logo has had a makeover; he looks a little less scary and seems to have given up cigars. ↩︎
  4. I do respect the need for content creators and developers to be compensated somehow for the work they do. The ads on Adjusted Cost Base are quite prominent and can be quite distracting. ↩︎
  5. You track your ACB in Canadian dollars, always. And you convert each transaction — buy or sell — to CAD. ↩︎
  6. The UI to do this is a bit (uncharacteristically) clunky, in my view — you can only import one year of transactions at a time, which gets tedious pretty quickly. ↩︎

ZGRO versus ZGRO.T: what’s the difference?

RobH2 Comments

ZGRO and ZGRO.T are both asset allocation funds (aka all-in-ones1) offered by BMO. They hold the same assets, and they both generate the same (dividends-reinvested) returns. But ZGRO.T says it has a yield of 5.65% whereas ZGRO has a yield of 1.73%2. How is this possible? Full disclosure: I don’t own either of these funds because I have historically invested in a very similar-to-ZGRO product, XGRO, instead3.

Let’s start with a really high level look at these funds4.

ZGRO vs ZGRO.T, Overview Tab (source bmogam.com)

The first thing I’ll point out is one of caution: ZGRO and ZGRO.T have very similar tickers and it’s all-too-easy to mix them up. The fund names are also very similar, although ZGRO.T adds the words “Fixed Percentage Distribution Units” to the mix. That’s a clue. The other things we can learn from this first glance is that ZGRO.T is pretty new (Inception Date), is about 1/20th the size of ZGRO in terms of investments (Net Assets), has an identical MER to ZGRO, but whoa, that distribution yield is off the charts. Put simply, if you had $1000 in ZGRO, and $1000 in ZGRO.T, and the last distribution paid was assumed to be constant5, you’d get $11.73 from ZGRO and $56.50 from ZGRO.T over the next twelve months. Huh?

This is even more puzzling if one takes a look at what each of the two ETFs hold: it’s identical:

ETF HeldZGRO %6ZGRO.T %
ZSP – S&P 50037.037.0
ZCN – TSX Capped20.420.4
ZAG – CAD Bond13.813.8
ZEA – MSCI EAFE13.413.4
ZEM – MSCI Emerg6.76.7
ZUAG – US Bond5.85.8
ZMID – US Mid Cap2.02.0
ZSML – US Small Cap1.01.0
Cash00

Comparing top holdings, ZGRO versus ZGRO.T. Can you see a difference? I can’t see a difference.

I spent quite a bit of time searching on the BMO website trying to get their take on the difference. In a lot of places, (e.g. the simplified prospectus7), the two funds are treated as the same. After nearly giving up, I did come across this document which has a teeny tiny footnote, which I reproduce here:

These units are Fixed Percentage Distribution Units that provide a fixed monthly distribution based on an annual distribution rate. Distributions may be comprised of net income, net realized capital gains and/or a return of capital. The monthly amount is determined by applying the annual distribution rate to the T Series Fund’s unit price at the end of the previous calendar year, arriving at an annual amount per unit for the coming year. This annual amount is then divided into 12 equal distributions, which are paid each month.

BMO Asset Allocation ETFs Whitepaper

So the big difference as I see is is that ZGRO.T attempts to give a stable yield in 12 month chunks. It does this by

  1. Giving you dividends from the underlying assets (so does ZGRO)
  2. Selling underlying assets (and generating a capital gain)
  3. Giving you back your own money (this is known as as return of capital)

Let’s take a look at the two from a tax perspective (note that this only matters if you were to hold these funds in a non-registered account):

ZGRO vs ZGRO.T 2024 Distribution Tax Tab (source bmogam.com)

And here the distinction between the two becomes clearer: ZGRO.T is making good use of Return of Capital (RoC) to distribute a dividend with limited near-term tax implications. But as always, there’s no free lunch — using RoC means that future capital gains will be higher since RoC reduces the ACB8 of the funds in question, and if your ACB drops to zero, you have to treat RoC as a capital gain.

So when might you consider using ZGRO.T instead of ZGRO?

ZGRO.T makes sense in a RRIF account. It’s essentially automating some of the steps I have to take every month to get paid (you can see the mechanism I use here). Every month, I have to sell some of my holdings in order to get the RRIF-minimum payment out.

In a non-registered account, ZGRO.T’s monthly distributions might be useful if you had the need for consistent monthly cash flow; in addition, if you expect to at some point be in a lower tax bracket, it might help you save future tax, since it’s deferring some gains by using Return of Capital. In my case, I don’t see a good reason to use it since I would have to sell existing assets in order to raise funds to buy it, which generates capital gains.

So, in summary, the two funds are the same from a total return perspective, with ZGRO.T more monthly cash and ZGRO providing more paper gains. In a RRIF account, ZGRO.T automates some of the manual selling needed to execute decumulation. In a non-registered account, the tax treatment of the two is different, and you’d have to work out the numbers to see if it’s a benefit or not.

  1. If you want to read about all-in-ones, https://moneyengineer.ca/2025/01/21/why-you-can-fire-your-advisor-asset-allocation-etfs/ is a good place to start. ↩︎
  2. This yield is calculated by dividing the most recent per share distribution by the share price and multiplying by 12. In essence, this number is the value of the most recent (monthly in the case of ZGRO.T, quarterly in the case of ZGRO) dividend payout extrapolated over the full year. It may or may not represent what kind of yield you get in the future. ↩︎
  3. Why? Inertia. There are minor differences in the makeup of XGRO versus ZGRO but either is a fine choice for the lazy investor. ↩︎
  4. All the tables here are right off BMO’s ETF selector, which is excellent, by the way. ↩︎
  5. ZGRO is currently paying 7.3 cents per share every quarter and this has been stable since 2020. ZGRO.T is currently paying 6 cents per unit held every month and this has been stable since March 2025. ↩︎
  6. As of September 18, 2025 ↩︎
  7. which weighs in at ~450 pages. I’d hate to see the non-simplified prospectus. ↩︎
  8. Adjusted Cost Base. The average per unit price you pay for a share, necessary to track in order to accurately calculate capital gains (or losses). I use adjustedcostbase.ca for this, found in Tools I Use ↩︎