Tag: VFV

people exchanging money in cantor

Retirement Portfolio is now USD-free

RobHLeave a comment

On September 4th, I sold my last units of DLR1 within my RRIF account and completed my multi-month activity of kicking USD out of retirement portfolio. I ended up doing this about 3 months faster than I anticipated, but that’s because Questrade offered a free two-month trial for Questrade Plus, which included as many free journaling activities2 as you wished during the trial. And since I’m a cheapskate, I figured saving the journaling fees was worth me upping the pace of my USD to CAD conversions.

I asked Claude to take a look at the various gambits I undertook3 and evaluate them. Claude was quite upbeat:

  • Claude calculated an effective blended rate of 1.39946.
  • Claude said I beat the spot rate by roughly +0.15% overall
  • And, as expected, Claude assessed that every single gambit landed within a few basis points of the spot market, much better than what Questrade would have charged me (1.5% or so).

So now, here’s what my various account types look like, in terms of assets. There’s no USD listed ETFs anymore. Here’s what the three kinds of accounts look like.

Let’s recap the major changes, per account type.

Non-Registered accounts

I’m always a bit reluctant to mess around with non-registered accounts since making trades here inevitably lead to capital gains. But the impact in the end was pretty minor.

There’s actually three separate accounts being considered here. Two are legacy investment accounts that have long-term holdings. The other is my so-called “cash cushion” account that is an integral part of my decumulation strategy, called “VPW”. You can read about the mechanics of it here.

So for the cash cushion, I had to get rid of ICSH in favour of ZMMK. I’m giving up roughly 1.2% in annual return by doing this, but I figure at some point the Bank of Canada and the US Federal Reserve will get closer in terms of their interest rates. This had a minor capital gain impact, which was as expected. Both ICSH and ZMMK keep a pretty stable price point (around $50/unit) and pay out monthly.

The bigger issue was getting rid of SCHF from my non-registered holdings, which I had held for a very long time. Selling that was going to trigger a large capital gain that I hadn’t accounted for in my tax calculations. The solution I came up with was pretty nifty, if I do say so myself. SCHF in my model is largely “International Equity” so clearly I was going to have to replace that international equity contribution somewhere. I ended up replacing SCHF with VCN (a Canadian equity holding) and replacing XIC (a slightly different Canadian equity holding than VCN) with VFV in the TFSA account. In essence, I moved my international equity stake out of my non-registered accounts and put it in the TFSA instead.

By buying VCN (a new fund for me) in my non-registered account, I reset the ACB of that fund so selling units a few months from now shouldn’t really attract too much in the way of capital gains. In fact, the first month4 I sold VCN to pay my monthly salary, I took a small loss. So my tax planning should also stay intact.

TFSA accounts

There were no USD assets in my TFSA to begin with, so no changes were needed on that account. I had to do some asset class shifting here while maintaining 100% equity allocation in the TFSA. As mentioned above, XIC (Canadian Equity) was dismissed from the TFSA, and replaced with VIU (which is international equity).

I do have a small desire to covert the TFSA into a custom index (a Questrade feature) to save a bit on the MER imposed by XEQT here. I may yet do this. It will expand the number of ETFs in these accounts since I’ll need to decompose XEQT into its constituent components. This is again a case of me adding complexity in order to save a few bucks…But don’t I owe it to my readership to give it a try?

RRIF accounts

Mainly, the RRIF accounts replaced AOA with XGRO and ICSH with ZST. But since XGRO holds a lot less US Equity than AOA did, the AOA to XGRO conversion wasn’t exact. I had to replace some of the AOA with a US Equity holding (VFV). I chose to use ZST instead of ZMMK in the RRIF for two reasons:

  • I wanted a different ETF in my RRIF as compared to my non-registered. This helps me avoid CRA superficial loss rules.
  • ZST is ever so slightly riskier than ZMMK, which is fine, since the cash position in the RRIF is much more static than the cash position in my non-registered account.

The way ahead

Getting rid of USD assets has simplified my portfolio and my workflow thinking. I no longer have to worry about USD/CAD exchange rates, and my need to use Norbert’s Gambit should be over. It also opens up my universe to other DIY brokers. I’ve been a fan of Wealthsimple, but couldn’t use them for my RRIF accounts since they contained USD assets. Now I can consider Wealthsimple for all my investing needs5.

Working through the mechanics of slowly moving my assets to an all CAD lineup has caused me to probably spend way more time than is healthy looking at my portfolio and making trades. This should come to an end — with DRIP set up across all registered accounts6, the holdings should be more or less on autopilot with only monthly checkins to make sure my asset allocations haven’t drifted too far from my targets.

I’ve updated my posts that talk about ETF all stars and the “Magnificent Seven” ETFs as well, for reference.

  1. Selling DLR is the last step of a Norbert’s Gambit when you’re converting USD to CAD. You can read about the gambit on Questrade here. ↩︎
  2. “Journaling” is the step that turns units of DLR.u (which are priced in USD) into units of DLR (which are priced in CAD). If you’re not a Questrade Plus subscriber, journaling costs $9.95 plus HST every time you do it on Questrade. ↩︎
  3. Ok, not all of them — Claude only connects to the accounts I own, and not those of my spouse. And the last trades haven’t settled yet, so the one I did on September 4th wasn’t showing up in my transaction history. I don’t expect the story is too different if I include the gambits I ran in my spouse’s RRIF account. ↩︎
  4. After making sure 30 days had passed in order to avoid a “superficial loss” in CRA’s parlance. ↩︎
  5. And if they offer a promotional offer that throws free money my way, I’d seriously consider switching brokers again. ↩︎
  6. I don’t use DRIP in non-registered accounts because non-registered transactions need to be logged for adjusted cost base adjustments; I’d prefer to keep these fully under my control to minimize the number of transactions. I don’t mind carrying a bit of cash in non-registered accounts in order to avoid excess trades. ↩︎

a person is holding a package with their hands

What companies are in my retirement portfolio?

RobH1 Comment

I cover what I hold in my retirement portfolio every month (latest update is here), but as you can see, I only hold ETFs. What’s underneath the ETFs? Let’s take a look!

Calculating this is straightforward:

  1. Use the percentages I have of each ETF from the June update
  2. Look at the “Holdings” section of ETF or in the case of AOA/XGRO/XEQT, “Aggregate Underlying Holdings”1 and write down the percentages of each stock. I stopped when I accounted for 20% of each ETF.
  3. Multiply (1) by (2) and add them all up.

By doing this exercise, I can now account for the 20 companies that make up 20% of my retirement portfolio:

These 20 companies are really the tip of my personal investment iceberg — my aggregate retirement portfolio has at least 32,000 holdings, since that’s what’s actually inside AOA, the one ETF I own with the most holdings2. But the fate of these 20 companies will have an outsized influence on the overall performance of the portfolio. The only surprise for me is that there is only one company outside North America in the list. I would have expected one or two more.

It will be interesting to see what kind of differences I see once I complete kicking USD out of my retirement portfolio and go back to a list of only seven magnificent ETFs. I’m not sure there will be big changes, given that I’m keeping my asset allocations constant throughout, but I’m expecting some differences3. We’ll see come January 2027, I guess.

Just for fun, and given my recent article on the SpaceX IPO, I wanted to know how much I held of that particular company. AOA hasn’t included it yet4, but XGRO and XEQT have already. As of June 30, 0.02% of my portfolio is invested in SpaceX.

  1. In most cases, as of June 30. VFV only shows to May 30. ↩︎
  2. XGRO has 22000, for reference. I think the extras in AOA come mostly from fixed income (bond) products since they have broader geographic coverage. ↩︎
  3. The biggest changes won’t be visible since they occur in the bond side of my holdings. AOA and XGRO have very different approaches to this part of the market, but as it’s only 15% of my retirement holdings, they don’t show up as a “top” holding in my retirement portfolio . ↩︎
  4. And won’t until SpaceX is profitable. AOA includes IVV, which is an S&P 500 index fund, and the S&P 500 requires companies to be profitable before inclusion in that index. ↩︎

different flavor of pizzas on a wooden surface

News: Questrade adds fractional share support for (some) Canadian ETFs

RobHLeave a comment

“Fractional Shares” allow you to buy less than a single share of the stock or ETF that supports it. Fractional shares ensure that every last penny of cash in your account is actively invested, which, in my view, is a Good Thing. Non-interest earning cash isn’t helping you meet your retirement goals.

Questrade currently holds the majority of my retirement savings, mostly because they were offering free money last year to move accounts over to them1.

They provided support for fractional US ETFs over a year ago, to great fanfare, with Canadian ETFs “coming soon”. It would appear that “soon” is “now”. There’s no way to see which Canadian ETFs have support for fractional trading in any sort of list, but here’s the status of the Canadian ETFs on my magnificent seven ETFs list2, which you can see if you ask for a quote of any symbol you’re interested in.

ETFFractional share support?
XGROYes
XEQTYes
XICYes
VFVYes3
XCBNo
ZSTNo
ZMMKYes

I’ve tested it out, and the one flaw I’ve found is that you cannot enter a dollar amount for a trade when using the Edge Web version of the Questrade platform. You’re free to do the math yourself and enter a decimal number of shares when using Edge Web4.

Wealthsimple also offers fractional ETFs, and there I have found no restrictions. Questrade is catching up, but still behind Wealthsimple in this regard.

  1. And if you are considering Questrade yourself, you can earn a bit of free money if you use my referral code: 755609544498867 ↩︎
  2. These are the ETFs that make up the lion’s share of my retirement portfolio. ↩︎
  3. Fractional VFV is particularly valuable since its unit cost is north of $100. ↩︎
  4. Which you are forced to do if you want to make trades on accounts for which you are the authorized trader. ↩︎
dollar cut in half

Kicking USD out of my retirement portfolio

RobH1 Comment

After much consideration, I’ve decided that holding USD-denominated assets during retirement is no longer a good idea. I have been struggling with this question for a while now.

There are a few reasons why I’ve reached this conclusion:

  • I no longer spend USD. I have two credit cards1 that allow me to avoid foreign exchange fees.
  • Complexity. The USD in my RRIF accounts needs to be converted periodically since withdrawals are in CAD. The USD in my non-registered account might eventually lead me to have to file a T1135, and I hate new tax wrinkles. And of course the USD funds add to the universe of funds I have to manage in all the accounts. Fewer is better!
  • Choice. Without USD in my portfolio, the universe of DIY brokers opens up2 and the number of accounts I have to have is also reduced34.

The fluctuating CAD/USD FX rate might be another reason, but that hasn’t really bothered me. In the long term, it’s reasonably stable.

So how to go about doing it, and what impacts will this have? Let’s take a look.

General considerations

So of course, the only real way to convert USD into CAD at Questrade is to use Norbert’s Gambit. Performing the Gambit is a multi-day activity:

  • Day 1: Sell the USD asset and buy DLR.U with the proceeds; make journaling request to convert DLR.U into DLR
  • Day 2: Wait for settlement of trades made on day 1
  • Day 3: Wait for journaling to complete
  • Day 4: Wait for journaling to complete
  • Day 5: Sell DLR and buy CAD-listed assets to replace what I sold on day 1

Each time I do this exercise, it makes me a little leery since

  • I have to pay $9.95 plus GST to journal the shares on Questrade (not a huge deal, but as you have read elsewhere on the blog, I am a cheapskate)
  • I’m out of the market for 3 days. I really hate being out of the market since big moves can happen over short periods of time. Of course, this cuts both ways; I could miss a big rally or a big meltdown as a result5.
  • I’m making a bet on favourable FX rates. FX rates don’t typically swing much in short periods of time, but since over 50% of my retirement portfolio is in USD I’m not willing to try to find the “right” time to make such a trade.

As a result, I’ve made the decision to

  • Sell off 1/6th of my USD portfolio every month for the next six months (or thereabouts). This will allow me to smooth out any FX speed bumps and limits how much of my portfolio is idle at any one time.
  • Take advantage of a free month of Questrade Plus6 and do a few journaling requests during this month and save a few bucks

While doing all of this, I’m trying to be mindful of my asset allocation targets which are (newly set as a result of my analysis at Are my portfolio’s asset allocation targets “correct”?)

  • 5% Cash
  • 15% Bonds
  • 23% Canadian Equity
  • 37% US Equity
  • 20% International Equity

I’ll try to start moving my portfolio to these new targets as I make this shift, but given the targets are brand new, I’m in no particular time constraints; I’m expecting the portfolio to slowly move from the old targets to the new ones, finally landing at some point later in 2026.

Kicking USD out of my RRIF accounts

Of the 5 RRIF accounts I have in the household (three for me, two for my spouse), only two of them have USD in it, and the USD portion is 100% invested in either AOA (an 80/20 all-in-one global equity fund) or ICSH (an ultra short-term bond fund that stands in for cash)

AOA can be replaced with XGRO but it’s not an exact replacement. AOA has almost no Canadian Equity content and a higher US Equity content than XGRO. This means that a one-to-one switch will cause my Canadian Equity content to increase and my US content to decrease. I’m expecting this will eventually cause me to need to replace some of my AOA with a pure play US Equity asset. I’ve chosen VFV since it mirrors the S&P 500, an index that won’t be adding the mega-IPOs any time soon 🙂

ICSH can be replaced with ZMMK since they are similar in nature, but I’m not going to do that. Why? Because I hold ZMMK in my non-registered account as a VPW cash cushion, I do make trades in ZMMK from time to time. I don’t want to end up in a situation where I’m selling ZMMK in my non registered account and buying it in my RRIF, since this could deprive me of possible (small) capital losses — CRA does not look kindly on trying to “artificially” generate capital losses in this way.

So after mulling it over a bit, I’ve decided to replace ICSH in my RRIF accounts with ZST. It’s a short term bond fund which is a bit riskier than ZMMK7, but I’m counting on it being cash-like for my purposes. Neither has been around all that long, but it appears they are pretty close on the performance front with a slight edge for ZST.

So when all is said and done, my RRIFs should have three holdings: XGRO (mostly), VFV (some), ZST (about 2.5% of overall portfolio),

Kicking USD out of my non-registered accounts

Here there are two holdings

  • ICSH in my VPW cash cushion account
  • SCHF, an international equity fund I’ve held for years and years

The ICSH replacement is easy — move it to ZMMK. I’ll do that all at once. It will mean a loss of over a percentage point in gains at the moment, but this is the price of simplicity, I guess.

The SCHF sale is a bit like selling 6 months of RRIF payments all at once, which will attract a capital gain. I’m ok with that, but I’d prefer to avoid more capital gains for the rest of the year (I didn’t budget for that when I tried to work out my likely tax bill for 2026). Since selling SCHF is actually helpful in getting my new asset allocation targets right, I don’t need to replace it with another International Equity fund. My calculations tell me that I’ll probably need to replace it with a Canadian Equity fund. Here I’ve chosen to use VCN since it uses a different index provider8 and would be considered different from my other non-registered Canadian equity funds, namely XIC and HXT9. Buying VCN and selling it in subsequent months to fund my retirement salary should result in minimal capital gains for the remainder of the year.

So when all is said and done, the VPW cash cushion account should be 100% ZMMK and the other non registered account will be 100% CAD-listed ETFs, mostly tied up in Canadian Equity.

You’ll be able to see my progress in my next instalment of What’s in my retirement portfolio (May 2026) which I should have ready at the end of this month!

  1. Rogers Mastercard and Wealthsimple Visa, as detailed in What are the best credit cards? ↩︎
  2. e.g. Wealthsimple does not currently (June 2026) support USD RRIF accounts. ↩︎
  3. e.g. QTrade USD accounts are always separated from CAD accounts. So instead of 4 RRIF accounts, I could have 8 at QTrade. Painful. ↩︎
  4. I guess that’s actually a “reduce complexity” argument. Don’t tell anybody. ↩︎
  5. https://www.bogleheads.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=370885 shows me that my fears are unfounded. It’s practically a normal distribution. ↩︎
  6. A subscription service offered by Questrade to give you free journaling. And other things I don’t really care about. ↩︎
  7. Average duration is longer, which makes its price more sensitive to changes in the overall interest rate environment. ↩︎
  8. FTSE Canada all cap rather than S&P/TSX for the others ↩︎
  9. And therefore avoids CRA’s superficial loss rules ↩︎

rocket launch space discovery

SpaceX and index investing

RobHLeave a comment

This Friday (June 12, 2026) SpaceX (which, as it turns out, doesn’t just make rockets — it also encompasses Starlink and Twitter — er, X) will launch its mega-IPO. It’s expected to immediately become a top 10 company in terms of market capitalization, putting it in the same stratosphere as Nvidia, Apple, and Microsoft.

There’s a lot of chatter over how (and even if) this will impact the boring old index investor. It might help to review what the major US Indices are. The major US indices1 that show up again and again in ETFs are

  • S&P 500 — this is the index used by ETFs like VFV, XSP, ZSP and HXS
  • S&P Total — this is used by XEQT/XGRO2 and AOA3
  • Nasdaq 100… includes ETFs like XQQ, ZQQ, HXQ4
  • The Solactive US Large Cap Index5: TPU aka TEQT
  • CRSP US Total Market Index — VUN, VUS and VEQT for example

The ETFs that track indices don’t have discretion over when or if to include a stock in their ETF. When the index changes, so does the ETF. It’s totally mechanical. The indices also have published rules on how and when to include stocks, but because SpaceX is anticipated to be so exceptionally large, there was pressure on the index providers to tweak their rules to make sure SpaceX was included. If you’re keeping score, only Nasdaq made changes to accommodate SpaceX. S&P did not.

After much anticipation, here’s the state of play as of June 9, 2026:

IndexSpaceX included when?How much?
S&P 500 (VFV, XSP, ZSP, HXS)>1 year from now6Float-adjusted, as usual
S&P Total (XEQT/XGRO, AOA)Once 10% float achieved…a quarter or two?Float-adjusted, as usual7
Nasdaq 100 (XQQ, ZQQ, HXQ, QQQ)Shortly after IPO…15 trading daysBased on full market cap, as usual
Solactive US Large Cap (TPU, TEQT)Next quarterly reviewFloat-adjusted
CRSP (VUN, VUS, VEQT)Shortly after IPO…5 trading daysFloat-adjusted

Many of the indices use the float-adjusted amounts; this means a lower weighting for SpaceX than its full market-cap, which means a lower weight in any index that uses float. In the coming months, I’ll take a peek at how much SpaceX I hold, and how it’s changing, just for my own education.

So, for me, it looks like I’ll be owning some SpaceX in the not-too-distant future since the vast majority of my US holdings are in XEQT/XGRO/AOA. And, the odds are, it will lose value post IPO. That kinda sucks.

Of course, as BMO correctly points out, nobody will be immune from this kind of market movement — why, you may ask? Given SpaceX is going to be included in the popular Nasdaq 100, funds that mirror this index are going to have to make room for the new arrival, selling off shares of things they already hold, like Nvidia, and Microsoft. This will create downward pressure on the prices of these tech stocks, and hence it will also create downward pressure on any ETF that also holds Nvidia, and Microsoft. The S&P 500 holds many of the Nasdaq 100 companies, so you can expect some price erosion of ETFs mirroring the S&P indices as the Nasdaq ETFs do their rebalancing act.

In the grand scheme of things, I don’t think I really care. I don’t love SpaceX, or any other stock for that matter. The S&P indices have historically rewarded the patient investor, and I see no reason to change my strategy based on one IPO, no matter how splashy. It won’t be the last — both Anthropic and OpenAI are probably close behind with their IPOs.

  1. The small cap Russell 2000 is also popular, but I don’t mention it in the main list since SpaceX is too big to be a small cap ↩︎
  2. This is a CAD ETF and holds things beyond “just” the S&P index. See more here. ↩︎
  3. This is a USD ETF, and holds things beyond just the S&P index. See more here. ↩︎
  4. The most famous Nasdaq 100 ETF trades in USD and is QQQ. This would explain the not-very-original names chosen by the Canadian management companies. ↩︎
  5. I think only TD uses this one, but since I’ve written about TEQT in the past, I figured I’d include it. ↩︎
  6. and likely longer, since there is a profitability screen imposed as well for inclusion in the S&P 500 ↩︎
  7. Over time, the size of the SpaceX float is expected to increase as insiders unload their shares; the timing of this is not known. I’d expect the SpaceX % to increase over the first year of inclusion on the S&P Total index. ↩︎